Close

Articles Posted in Court Decisions

Updated:

Federal Judge Chides Defense for Destroying Evidence in Accident Lawsuit

In any personal injury lawsuit, it is critical the parties to the case preserve any relevant evidence. A court may sanction either side if there is destruction or “spoliation” of evidence. A recent decision by a federal judge in Macon offers an example of these sanctions in practice. Little v.…

Updated:

Federal Court Holds Medical Interest Groups Should Not Dictate Admissibility of Expert Testimony

Expert testimony is a critical element of medical negligence cases. The United States Supreme Court has charged trial judges with serving as “gatekeepers” who must screen out “speculative, unreliable expert testimony” before it even reaches a jury. But that does not mean judges enjoy unlimited discretion to decide which experts…

Updated:

Georgia Court of Appeals Says Accident Victim May Pursue Damages Arising from Emotional Trauma

On July 16, a fractured Georgia Court of Appeals held a plaintiff could seek damages for emotional distress arising from a truck accident. Although Georgia law generally does not allow damages for “negligent infliction of emotional distress,” there is an exception for a “pecuniary loss” arising from physical injury. In…

Updated:

Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Accident Victim’s Right to Seek “Uninsured Motorist” Compensation

The Supreme Court of Georgia issued an important decision on July 11 that will make it easier for accident victims to pursue uninsured motorist claims against their insurance carriers. The Supreme Court, reversing a 2013 decision by the Georgia Court of Appeals, said a plaintiff could allocate part of a…

Updated:

Georgia Court Revives Pastor’s “Slip-and-Fall” Lawsuit Against Church

Under Georgia law, the owner of a premises is liable for any injuries arising from a failure to “exercise ordinary care” in keeping said premises safe. A recent decision from the Georgia Court of Appeals illustrates how this duty is applied in “slip-and-fall” cases where there is an alleged hazard…

Updated:

“Sovereign Immunity” Won’t Let State Off the Hook for Faulty Road Design

On July 10, the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled a lawsuit against the state’s Department of Transportation (DOT) could go forward. The lawsuit arose from a deadly accident at a recently redesigned road in Atlanta. The DOT argued it could not be held liable under the doctrine of “sovereign immunity,”…

Updated:

Appeals Court Clarifies Definition of “Emergency Department” in Malpractice Cases

Under Georgia law, an emergency room doctor (or other emergency health care provider) is not liable for malpractice unless there is “clear and convincing evidence” of “gross negligence.” This rule only applies when a patient is treated in “an emergency department” or taken to surgery from an emergency department. But…

Updated:

Georgia Supreme Court Shields Psychiatric Records From Family of Suicide Victim

Georgia law declares “communications between [a] psychiatrist and patient” privileged and therefore excluded as evidence in a civil proceeding. But what happens when the patient is deceased and his heirs have reason to believe the psychiatrist may be responsible? A divided Georgia Supreme Court recently addressed that question. Cooksey v.…

Contact Us
Start Chat